Short verdict
Nomi documents shared notes and memory views; PolyBuzz offers a character-chat workflow whose current controls should be checked in the account. Compare how you can correct one fictional event and inspect later replies. A successful correction in one turn does not prove permanent erasure of the earlier information.
PolyBuzz vs Nomi is a practical comparison when a character remembers a fictional event incorrectly. The problem is narrower than “which service has better memory?” You need to correct one event without accidentally changing the setting, character personality or relationship established elsewhere.
Official documentation was checked on October 8, 2026. The correction exercise is original, and this site has not measured either provider’s recall or audited stored data.
State one correction positively
Suppose an adult fictional explorer lent a map to a colleague. The assistant later says the map was destroyed. Your correction should state the agreed event directly: the explorer lent the map, and the colleague still has it. Avoid a paragraph repeating every incorrect version, which makes the intended fact harder to identify.
Preserve two unrelated facts as controls: the explorer lives near the coast and prefers traveling by train. If either changes after the map correction, the repair has affected more than its intended scope.
| Record | Intended result |
|---|---|
| Map event | Loaned, not destroyed |
| Current holder | The fictional colleague |
| Home region | Unchanged |
| Travel preference | Unchanged |
| Next action | Player decides whether to request the map back |
Identify the control you are changing
Nomi documents shared notes for important context and describes Mind Map as a view of part of its memory structure. A visible memory view should not be treated as an exhaustive inventory of everything stored. For PolyBuzz, inspect the current account’s available character and conversation controls rather than assuming the same memory editor exists.
Correcting the next reply, editing a persistent note and requesting account-data deletion are different operations. Use the narrowest supported control that fits a fictional continuity repair. Save your own canon note before making a larger change.
Check later recall without leading the answer
After the correction, discuss another harmless scene detail for two turns. Then ask where the map is. On a later session, give a neutral cue about the trip and ask again. Record each response rather than announcing that a single correct answer establishes permanent memory.
If the assistant reconstructs a new story in which the map was first destroyed and then replaced, correct that added history too. The goal is the original loan, not an elaborate reconciliation that preserves the mistake as canon.
Choose by repair effort and visibility
Nomi is a candidate when its documented note and memory-view tools help you maintain a continuing character. PolyBuzz may suit catalog-led character use if the available controls and replies meet the same task. Choose after seeing how much effort the correction requires in the setup you intend to keep.
For a different account format, read PolyBuzz vs Replika. Keep this comparison focused on fictional facts; a conversational acknowledgment is not evidence that a provider erased all earlier data.
Sources and freshness
This is source-informed editorial analysis, not a hands-on benchmark. Proposed tests are evaluation suggestions, not reported results. Features, prices, limits, and policies can change; verify current official terms before acting.
Independent publication; verify current details with each provider.